Untouchability is a terrible reality.

Untouchability is a hydra-headed monster.

If untouchability lives, humanity must die.

Untouchability is an error of long standing.

The attack on untouchability is an attack on this high-and low-ness.

I would far rather that Hinduism died than that untouchability lived.

My fight against untouchability is a fight against the impure in humanity.

The removal of untouchability is one of the highest expressions of ahimsa.

The removal of untouchability is a question of the purification of Hinduism.

Untouchability is a blot on Hinduism. It is a canker eating into its vitals.

They learned to hate her unknowability, her untouchability, the collage of her.

A true man of piety will consider himself a sinner and, therefore, untouchable.

The untouchability of Hinduism is probably worse than that of the modern imperialists.

The purification required is not of untouchables but of the so-called superior castes.

We shall dig our own grave if we do not purge ourselves of this curse of untouchability.

To remove untouchability is a penance that caste Hindus owe to Hinduism and to themselves.

Men like me feel that untouchability is no integral part of Hinduism, it is an excrescence.

Hinduism dies if untouchability lives, and untouchability has to die if Hinduism is to live.

Ravana was a rakshasa but this rakshasi of untouchability is even more terrible than Ravana.

Hindu-Muslim unity, khaddar and removal of untouchability are to me the foundation of Swaraj.

So long as untouchability disfigures Hinduism, so long do I hold the attainment of Swaraj to be an utter impossibility.

When untouchability is rooted out, these distinctions will vanish and no one will consider himself superior to any other.

There is no 'as far as possible' on the question of untouchability. If it is to go, it must go in its entirety from the temples as from everywhere else.

Share This Page