Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
Commerce was the best job I could ever have.
Trade is an integral part of our foreign policy.
There is no room for politics in the Commerce Department.
Some people would like the world to go back to the 1950s.
Party leaders aren't responsible for every candidate's gaffe.
Young people - motivating them in any election is hard to do.
A chief of staff has to reflect the president's governing style.
Our focus must be on making America the best place on earth to do business.
No one knows the Senate better than Joe Biden; he lived there for 35 years.
Contrary to what most people think, there is a Rich Daley under Mayor Daley.
If we don't set the rules for commerce in the Asia-Pacific region, China will.
I got through at Ignatius. I did OK, not great in any of my academic endeavors.
There are 14 Cabinet spots, and God only knows how many hundreds of people want them.
The reason CAFTA should be enacted is not economic benefits: it is national security.
For any business, large or small, not to have an e-commerce strategy is a big mistake.
The mistake we made in the 1990s was overestimating the potential of NAFTA's positive impact.
Politics is all about relationships, people. A lot of it's emotional. It's not rocket science.
There is no path to middle-class prosperity without tearing down barriers to American exports.
It's been proven in Washington: It's very hard to negotiate and try to get a deal done in public.
Centrist voters typically decide general elections, so hard-left or hard-right platforms don't help.
The chief of staff has to reflect and sometimes complement the strengths of the president he serves.
Business leaders should show what our political leaders seem to lack - that is, a common-sense view of the times.
There are some who want to move us back to the days when we were protectionists and keep all goods off our shores.
You can use all the flowery words in the dictionary, but sooner or later, you have to let people know where you stand.
It sounds good to say, 'We're going to do this,' on C-SPAN, but try to do that in real life, and it's not going to work.
As a pro-business Democrat, I understand the obligations of publicly traded companies to maximize returns to shareholders.
Most people who talk about either entitlement cuts or revenue - when you have to put pen to paper, it is much more difficult.
I was Al Gore's campaign chairman in 2000, when he won a half-million more votes than George W. Bush but lost the presidency.
While a truly national third party wouldn't necessarily be bad, smaller niche parties are ill-suited to our federalist system.
Bob Gates understands the difficulty of going to war. This is a man who spent almost his entire life working for the government.
Illinois needs a real strategy for job creation that grows the economy over the long term with high-wage jobs that rebuild the middle class.
President Obama came into office in '08 with the belief that - and the public's belief in him - that he was moderate, that he wasn't a big spender.
When the manufacturing decline began in earnest in 2001, the main culprits were the offshoring of jobs to China, with which we have no trade deal, and automation.
Sanders insists the party adopt 'the most progressive platform ever passed' at its Philadelphia convention. Since when does the runner-up get to dictate the platform?
What comes into the Oval Office are not the good or easy decisions. The easy decisions are made elsewhere. The things that make it to the Oval are always the hard ones.
Trump is a different politician. He was a different businessman. His campaign was different. What you saw in his campaign is what you're going to see in his presidency.
If anything, the Democrats' salvation may lie in the fact that Republicans seem even more hell-bent on allowing their radical wing to drag the party away from the center.
We can't give the impression to our allies or friends in Asia that because the president is against TPP... that therefore, economically, we're going to pull away from Asia.
Whether McCain actively sought Palin in 2008 or passively yielded to aides' pressure, he set a new standard for GOP candidates who rely on lots of sizzle and little substance.
Now that Donald Trump has won the presidency despite losing the popular vote, there's a growing cry to rethink, or even abolish, the electoral college. This would be a mistake.
As president, you can't just say, 'I want this,' or, 'Do that.' A president has to lead the American people to where he wants to go, and the chief of staff needs to help him get it done.
There is no question of the benefits that opening a market of a billion people will bring to American businesses. But as I said last year, this will test China and the world trade system.
While imperfect, the electoral college has generally served the republic well. It forces candidates to campaign in a variety of closely contested races, where political debate is typically robust.
The Republican establishment's 2008 embrace of Palin set an irresponsibly low bar. Coincidence or not, a batch of nonsense-spewing, hard-right candidates quickly followed, often to disastrous effect.
When a state offers your company an attractive package of incentives to relocate, you have to look at it, and if it significantly boosts your bottom line, you have to take it or answer to your investors.
There's a growing sense among large corporations that to solve global problems like climate change, the responsibility can't fall just on the government. The business community has to be a big piece of that.
In my opinion, it is not in our interest to have complicated negotiations with a region, and then have to follow it up with 535 negotiations at home. I have experienced recounts, and it is better to vote once.
Lots of people throw around phrases of 'no-fly zone,' and they talk about it as though it's just a game - a video game or something. Some people who throw that line out have no idea what they're talking about.
Most Republicans and the business community extol the virtues of trade, depicting it as an engine of economic progress, while most Democrats and unions attack the exportation of American jobs, claiming that trade agreements are destroying our economy.
The Microsoft actions announced today are exactly the kinds of industry initiatives we need. Microsoft is using its resources to bring real privacy protection to Internet users by creating incentives for more websites to provide strong privacy protection.