Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while ...

Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws.

People have good and bad days.

You got good and bad people everywhere.

People need good lies. There are too many bad ones.

If there were no bad people, there would be no good lawyers.

Technology itself is neither good nor bad. People are good or bad.

I think it's very easy for people to stereotype athletes, good and bad.

I think most people are indifferent in their evaluation of what is good or bad.

There are a mix of good and bad people everywhere, be it Punjab, Delhi or Haryana.

People can do bad things for good reasons, or for what they think are good reasons.

It is absurd to divide people into good and bad. People are either charming or tedious.

I'm a bad loser, but I'm not a good winner either - I like to rub it in people's faces!

People don't want to see Hulk Hogan as the bad guy. Hulk Hogan is the ultimate good guy.

In general, we are lazy as consumers and just want to label people as good guy, bad guy.

People can be only divided into good or bad; their race, religion, nationality don't matter.

I was really good at being a bad guy; I like that role. Not being bad to people - just talking bad.

My dad was a movie star. Having that name was good and bad. People think it's a silver spoon. It's not.

People are going to have their opinions. Whether it's good or bad, I don't really think about it either way.

When people think Arsenal had a bad season and we've had a good one, yet they still finish above us, it hurts.

There's a bigger percentage of good cops than bad cops. But the bad cops should be penalised like regular people.

You have to tell the whole truth, the good and the bad, maybe some things that are uncomfortable for some people.

I understand when results don't go well, it gets broken down and people blame whoever. You've got to take the good with bad.

People are three-dimensional. They're not good or bad. They're not righteous or unrighteous. They are a million different things.

There's lots of bad things about teaching, but the really good thing is that you get to be around young people - irritating as they are.

I'm pretty calculating. I take stuff that I know appeals to people's bad sides and match it up with stuff that appeals to their good sides.

I've dealt with a lot of people with bad intentions. Just because somebody has a following does not mean that they are a good person or a good friend.

There are good leaders who actively guide and bad leaders who actively misguide. Hence, leadership is about persuasion, presentation and people skills.

I'd read a lot of thrillers about politicians and presidents, but never one where you flip the stereotypes and make good people bad and bad people good.

It is sometimes hard to grasp the difference between identifying with one's own roots, understanding people with other roots, and judging what is good or bad.

I think finally good writing gets out there, and people like it, and bad writing doesn't. Well, no. Bad writing does get out there 'cause some people like it.

When you're in prison, and we're left to our own devices, you're stripped of everything, and you really get to see who these people are, the good and the bad.

A boxing match is like a cowboy movie. There's got to be good guys and there's got to be bad guys. And that's what people pay for - to see the bad guys get beat.

Things were easier for the old novelists who saw people all of a piece. Speaking generally, their heroes were good through and through, their villains wholly bad.

If anything goes bad, I did it. If anything goes semi-good, we did it. If anything goes really good, then you did it. That's all it takes to get people to win football games for you.

I have seen good nurses and bad nurses. They existed along a continuum: from hard-working, kind and competent people, to office-hugging, bone-idle types, to apathetic, disengaged automatons.

Everybody we meet has an influence on us and an impact - good or bad. And I think that's why we have to be careful with the way we handle people because what we're doing is making an impact.

I think the idea of a 'perfect job' is a myth - there are pros and cons of every position, good days and bad days, and even what most people would consider dream jobs come with their share of downsides.

I think the self is complicated, that at various times we are all various people, and wrestling actually does a lot with that. You have things like heel turns where a person goes from being a good guy to a bad guy.

Nobody's really unsympathetic, I think. People do good and bad things. If a character's totally unsympathetic, they're not real and I'm not interested. Even the real monsters have to have a spark of something you can relate to.

I knew some people at my school who were squatters, and my younger brother was a squatter. I knew those guys: those were the people who said the Russians were the good guys and the Americans were bad. But I was the guy who went to the disco.

We should govern our actions by assuming that people are more good than bad. Whereas, most of our social policies dictate that people are more bad than good. That you know if you do something, it'll be seized by the rich to exploit the poor.

I used to think I was tough, but there's a difference between bravado and courage, and I only started to show courage when I began to get help. So now I make a point of telling people, 'Hey, it's a good thing to ask for help, not a bad thing.'

In the final analysis, the questions of why bad things happen to good people transmutes itself into some very different questions, no longer asking why something happened, but asking how we will respond, what we intend to do now that it happened.

Television isn't inherently good or bad. You go to a bookstore, there are how many thousands of books, but how many of those do you want? Five? Television's the same way. If you're going to show people stuff, television is the way to go. Words and pictures show things.

The very paradigm of revolution, of right versus wrong, good versus bad, is a relic with no bearing on the present. Yet artists, exhibitions, and curators valorize the sixties. People who wrote about these artists 30 years ago still write about them in the same ways, often for the same magazines.

Talking to people is beneficial if you can identify the right people to share ideas and discuss decisions because everyone has blind spots, and others can sometimes catch yours. I think an investment team is a bad idea, but it is a good idea to talk to trustworthy individuals who do not have biases or interests.

Share This Page