Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator.

I do not have body doubles like Saddam Hussein had.

It is beyond dispute that Saddam Hussein is a menace.

The world is a better place with Saddam Hussein gone.

Saddam Hussein wrote the book on human rights violations.

If you catch him, just give me four seconds with Saddam Hussein.

America was cool with Saddam Hussein when he was killing Iranians.

Saddam Hussein and people like him were very much involved in 9/11.

I think the world is much better off without Saddam Hussein than with him.

If it was up to the U.N., Saddam Hussein would still be killing his own people.

Planning and preparations for Iraq after Saddam Hussein were wholly inadequate.

Iraq is better without Saddam Hussein than with Saddam Hussein. Without a doubt.

I didn't see Saddam Hussein as being quite the danger that some other people did.

Saddam Hussein admired, studied, and copied Stalin, the paragon of modern dictators.

I can support going in after Saddam Hussein, but I want to make sure I don't go alone.

Saddam Hussein is a homicidal dictator who is addicted to weapons of mass destruction.

To avoid a military conflict, Saddam Hussein has no other choice than to leave the country.

Kim Jong-un's style is more suggestive of Saddam Hussein or his murderous son, Uday Hussein.

Saddam Hussein was the one person after whom the United States went, and they ruined the country.

Nuclear deterrence doesn't work outside of the Russian - U.S. context; Saddam Hussein showed that.

In liberating Iraq, we have rid the nation and the rest of the world from the danger of Saddam Hussein.

We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.

I can't do anything too serious like Saddam Hussein, but I would like to do Bill Clinton. That'd be fun.

Saddam Hussein was a horrible man, and I am pleased he is no longer running Iraq. But the war was wrong.

All around the world one heard or read that there was no connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda.

We have defeated Saddam Hussein and Iraq. The good news is Iraq is ours, and the bad news is Iraq is ours.

There were no weapons of mass destruction and Saddam Hussein was not involved in the September 11th attack.

It was Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda who attacked the U.S. on September 11, 2001, not Saddam Hussein and Iraq.

Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on Sept. 11. Osama bin Laden did, and as far as we know he's still alive.

In the 1990s, we were certain that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear arsenal. In fact, his factories could barely make soap.

You go to war when there is a security threat, and Saddam Hussein was seen as a threat to our interests and our security.

I hope the example of Saddam Hussein will give a lesson to leaders of other countries where human rights are not respected.

I was an opponent of Saddam Hussein when the British and American governments and businessmen were selling him guns and gas.

I try to read everything that I can about myself because Saddam Hussein didn't read his reviews and he thought he was winning!

Contrary to what the Americans frequently reiterated, al-Qaeda did not have any relationship with Saddam Hussein or his regime.

Someone once asked, 'What is the difference between me and Saddam Hussein?' The answer is, 'I have a conscience and he doesn't.'

Whatever efforts for peace President Gorbachev had in mind, they were pretty substantially undercut very swiftly by Saddam Hussein.

I don't know if, at the end of the day, how brave Saddam Hussein would be if he were stripped of his bodyguards and everything else.

I just think everything we do has an unintended consequence. We take out Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and Iraq was the check against Iran.

Saddam Hussein was an odious dictator, but he was also a very effective opponent of Iran. He was also a very effective opponent of al-Qaida.

Saddam Hussein has openly admitted to the rest of the world that he had weapons of mass destruction. He used those weapons to kill his own people.

Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein brutally repressed all forms of opposition to his regime, and before the Iraq War, al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq.

Under Saddam Hussein, the nation of Iraq possessed and used chemical weapons against both their own Kurdish population and Iranian military forces.

The Chavez-Obama pictures will join a postmodern photo array that includes Donald Rumsfeld gifting Saddam Hussein with spurs from President Reagan.

The threat from Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction - chemical, biological, potentially nuclear weapons capability - that threat is real.

I happen to believe that the preemption school is correct, that the risks of allowing Saddam Hussein to acquire his weapons will only grow with time.

As brutal as Saddam Hussein was, it was a mistake to just eliminate him. The same is true for Moammar Gadhafi and for Libya, which is now a failed state.

I, for one, begin with intent. There is no question that, Saddam Hussein had intent to do harm to the Western alliance and to the United States of America.

It is now conventional wisdom that Americans do not care why we went to war in Iraq, that it is enough that the world is better off without Saddam Hussein.

It was known in the mid 90s already that Saddam Hussein was a dangerous tyrant that he had already launched aggressions against Iran, he had invaded Kuwait.

Share This Page