I believe, that there is at least de facto cooperation between United States and Iran, at least in Iraq.

U.S. military action in Iraq: It sure didn't work out well last time. Let's not make that mistake again.

The defection of Hussein Kamel was a turning point in the U.N.-imposed disarmament of Iraq in the 1990s.

I was against the war in Iraq.The record shows that I'm right. When I did an interview with Howard Stern.

I think the suffering, violence and cruelty and Guantanamo and the rest is going to go on and on in Iraq.

Human rights and individual liberties, including religious freedom, will be at the heart of the new Iraq.

We're in fact on plan. And where we stand today is not, in my view, only acceptable but truly remarkable.

The money from Iraqi oil will be yours - it will no longer be used by Saddam Hussein for his own benefit.

If we can rebuild Iraq, we can rebuild Illinois and Indiana and if we can do Baghdad, we can do Baltimore.

I believe Saddam Hussein's strategic objective was, and remains, to assert dominance over the Gulf region.

Republican control of the Senate = expanded neocon wars in Syria and Iraq. Boots on the ground are coming!

Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.

We have defeated Saddam Hussein and Iraq. The good news is Iraq is ours, and the bad news is Iraq is ours.

We must do everything we can to be more aggressive in confronting Syria about what they are doing in Iraq.

At the end of the day we want to bring stability and hope to Iraq. That's the only way to defeat terrorism.

In Iraq, embedding allows us to put reporters in situations that would otherwise be too dangerous for them.

The United States, as all you know, did not come to Iraq for oil, not to occupy. We came here only to help.

Retreat might give us a moment of respite but years of repentance at our weakness would, I believe, follow.

Liberating Iraq from a legacy of violence and putting it on the path to peace and prosperity will take time.

That we have collectively failed to halt and repudiate the war in Iraq makes us even worse than the Germans.

CNN said that after the war, there is a plan to divide Iraq into three parts: regular, premium and unleaded.

That, what we're really seeing in Iraq is not a terrible war, but in fact, just the media's portrayal of it.

I can think of a lot of words to describe Senator Kerry's position on Iraq; "consistent" is not one of them.

Today, I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year.

The intelligence failures with respect to Iraq were massive and have damaged our credibility around the world

Iraq is a strange country. Where else can American civilians like me be protected by terrorist human shields?

If gun free zones save lives, why doesn't Obama just declare Iraq, Syria & Afghanistan one big gun free zone?

One outcome is almost certain. Extremism stands to benefit enormously from an uncalculated adventure in Iraq.

It was Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda who attacked the U.S. on September 11, 2001, not Saddam Hussein and Iraq.

Nobody should claim that the war [in Iraq] is over. But certainly it can be said that the regime is finished.

Iran has interest in seeing that the Shia population of Iraq basically adhere to a line that comes from Iran.

The longer we remain in Iraq the more our occupation becomes part of the problem... rather than the solution.

The invasion only made matters worse. The occupation will not work, Iraq is unoccupiable, that will not work.

John Howard's credibility on the entire Iraq war has been torpedoed by John Howard's own intelligence agency.

Conventional wisdom holds that setting a timetable for getting American troops out of Iraq would be a mistake.

Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.

Maybe Iraq will come back and become the dominant power among Arab countries. That seems to me as conceivable.

Iraq is part of a legitimate American effort not to have democracy everywhere but to have democracy somewhere.

Aside from an intervention, which I don't think is on anybody's mind, Iraq is going to have defend for itself.

We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.

The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We've removed an ally of al Qaeda.

The United States prefers that Iraq meet its obligations voluntarily, yet we are prepared for the alternative.

We must win in Iraq. If we withdraw, there will be chaos; there will be genocide; and they will follow us home.

Mission accomplished? The mission in Iraq, as laid out by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, has failed.

The Americans are stuck in Iraq and have no way out. They are like a wolf whose tail has been caught in a trap.

The bottom line is that we've had enormous successes (in Iraq) and we will continue to have enormous successes.

We must win in Iraq. If we withdraw, there will be chaos, there will be genocide, and they will follow us home.

Tony Blair is a brilliant politician. Unfortunately, his legacy is entwined with George W. Bush because of Iraq.

In a new poll 54 percent believed President Bush exaggerated the size of Iraq's missile threat. Hey, he's a guy.

We civilians defend our own right to free speech. The military in Iraq does not defend our right to free speech.

Share This Page