As the 'critic of color,' I'm frequently asked to review Indian and Pakistani writers.

I don't go online, I don't read reviews, I try not to look at anything on the Internet.

I get terrible reviews, but there are people who like to see me in the movies, I guess.

Whenever he composes a critical review, I have been told, he gets an enormous erection.

I write reviews of science books for the Boston Globe, so I like to give science books.

It is always dishonest for a reviewer to review the author instead of the author's book.

I never read bad reviews about myself, because my friends invariably tell me about them.

All writers are the same - they forget a thousand good reviews and remember one bad one.

How oft review; each finding, like a friend, Something to blame, and something to commend.

No one can duplicate the confidence that RSA offers after 20 years of cryptanalytic review.

I can get very depressed by a review that is unfair, unreasonable, and totally destructive.

My dad thought I'd end up in the poorhouse or in doughnut shops with a bag full of reviews.

I don't read reviews. I refuse to have my ego inflated or deflated by someone I don't know.

It's enormously cheering to get a good review by someone who seems to understand your work.

I never read reviews. I'm not interested. But I value a lot the reactions of the spectators.

Reviews about film acting are very... tricky, because movies are such a collaborative thing.

I collect all the reviews of the films I turned down. And when they're bad - I have to smile.

Personally, I read reviews because I'm interested by them, but they don't have utility for me.

I didn't read reviews earlier in my career, but I read them now as I'm older. I read them all.

I think that I've got some pretty bad reviews on albums or songs that later proved themselves.

I'm not reading reviews and critics. I don't care. I guess I'm still a little on my own planet.

If I get a bad review, I dont take it personally because everyone is entitled to their opinion.

The 'New York Times' reviews of my work have been evenly divided - favourable and unfavourable.

I don't really read reviews and comments that much. There just isn't a lot to be gained from it.

I don't read reviews because if they're bad I'm devastated and if they're good I get a big head.

When the reviews are bad I tell my staff that they can join me as I cry all the way to the bank.

For the movie review columns, I always knew exactly what I was going to write about - the movies.

If you start believing all that press about you, you're in trouble. I don't even read my reviews.

That's what keeps me up at three in the morning: Who's looking at reviews of Cabin Boy right now?

I'm always surprised when people say, "Oh, it got such mixed reviews." I guess I didn't read them.

Most books reviews aren't very well-written. They tend to be more about the reviewer than the book.

I'm not one of those people who says, 'I never read reviews,' because I don't believe those people.

I've never yet read a review of one of my own books that I couldn't have written much better myself.

Review your work. You will find, if you are honest, that 90% of the trouble is traceable to loafing.

I don't read my own reviews and I haven't for probably 15 years. I read other people's reviews, though.

'Downton' took a long time to catch fire in America, but we have been getting good reviews for 'Tango.'

I did some film reviews for small papers in Finland and things like that to be able to keep living here.

By and large, musicians respect New York audiences, and also are greatly concerned about New York reviews.

Reviews are great. I can read negative reviews and say, You know that point they made... they were dead on.

If you have too good a time writing hostile reviews, you'll injure not only your sensibility but your soul.

I have not given much credence to reviews of my films. Sometimes they're wrong, but it didn't matter to me.

I don't read any reviews, so I'm oblivious to what they have to say. I'm completely unaware. It's fantastic.

I really do hope that the people will like 14:59. The critics seem to like it. We got a lot of good reviews.

Critics always get the lyrics wrong in reviews, which is amusing - especially when they use them against you.

When The Stone Roses first came out, the early reviews called me 'simian.' I had to look that up at the time.

I work really hard at these books, and when colleagues write nasty reviews of them, I take it very personally.

The hateful reviews are very funny. And sometimes you can enjoy a hateful review much more than a good review.

If you're texting a friend about dinner, Google will give you restaurant reviews and directions automatically.

When I first started, all the reviews of Cold Chisel would say, 'This singer won't have a voice in six months.'

I don't read reviews because by then it's too late - whatever anyone says, the book won't change. It is written.

Share This Page